The US Enemies List (plus Tweets)

One of my recent tweets is a just-released Gallup poll. Since 2001, Gallup has asked USians an open-ended question about their country’s enemies. That question is, “What one country anywhere in the world do you consider to be the United States’ greatest enemy today?”

For the first time since asking this question, North Korea is at the top of the list. Not only is it at the top, but more than half of respondents chose it (51%). No other country has ever been that high. Previously, the highest result was 32% by Iran in 2012. Iran also came pretty close to that in 2006 with 31%.

Four countries dominate the US Enemies List. You can probably guess which ones they are. Along with North Korea and Iran, Russia and China are the countries USians most often see as enemies.

Gallup graph of countries named by USians as enemy 2001-2018

Source: Gallup (Click graphic to go to source.)


One of the things that strikes me about this is the effect of the media on public opinion. In recent months, negative stories about North Korea, especially in relation to their nukes, have dominated coverage. There’s been a lot of talk about Russia too, but not so much as an actual physical threat.

But when you think about it, Russia is a much greater threat to the US than North Korea. People worry that North Korea’s nukes can now reach the continental US. However, Russia has nukes that can reach the US too, and a lot more of them. The only real difference is that everyone has got used to Russia (and China) having nuclear weapons. Before China had nukes, many in the US were insistent that they should never get them and were sure that the first thing China would do was bomb the US. Throughout the Cold War, there was a real fear in both Russia and the US that nuclear war was imminent.

However, it never eventuated, and we know why. People in Russia and China aren’t really that different from the rest of us despite the impression given in the media. They don’t want nuclear war any more than anyone else does. The same goes for North Korea. The people of North Korea don’t want nuclear war, and Kim Jong un wants to retain power. The quickest way to lose his country, and probably his life, would be to start any kind of military conflict.

So, yes, it’s scary that yet another country his nuclear weapons. However, I don’t see President Kim as at all likely to use them. They make him feel safe from threats to his leadership from the US and China. And, quite frankly, I understand how he feels.

Generals escorting Kim Jong Il's hearse. (NY Times pic.)

Generals escorting Kim Jong Il’s hearse. (Source: New York Times. Click pic to go to source.)

That’s not to say I support Kim in any way. He’s the epitome of the evil dictator. He’s all smiles in public photos, and behind the scenes he’s killed most of his family since coming to power. At the funeral of his father and predecessor, Kim Jong il, Kim Jong un and several other generals (Kim Jong un has multiple military designations) escorted the hearse in the funeral procession on foot. Every one of those generals, including the one standing behind him in this pic who was Kim’s uncle, has since been executed.

Then there are the at least 100,000 people in prison camps where they are routinely beaten, raped, tortured, and worked to death or otherwise killed. When a person defects, they do so with the knowledge that every member of their extended family will probably be sent to one of those camps. Thus there’s not even the excuse of committing a crime for the incarceration of these people (though no one should be subjected to such inhumane conditions whatever their crime, of course).

However, I digress. In my opinion, if any country is seen as an enemy to USians, the first pick should be Russia. The Russians are the reason the Syrian war is still ongoing and US troops are being killed and injured there. The Russians are the reason there is still fighting in the east of Ukraine, and I’ve no doubt special forces are involved there. Russian support of President Erdoğan in Turkey is the reason USians are still being killed and injured in Iraq.

Perhaps worst of all long term though is what Russia has done and is continuing to do to damage US democracy. They have worked on the already existing partisan divisions via a targeted media campaign that has been so successful that the distrust and even hatred between Republicans and Democrats is at an all time high. It’s years since a budget has been agreed to, very little legislation is making its way through at the federal level, and what does get through is poorly drafted and highly partisan. Conspiracy theorists are having a field day – even the president supports some of their cockamamie ideas. And I believe that the Russian interference is a big factor in why the US currently has a president who, even if you love him, you have to admit is not up to the job. If the presidency was an episode of The Apprentice, Trump would have been fired in his first week.

Even worse, apparently little is being done to stop the Russian interference. The attitude of Trump seems to be that admitting it’s a major issue is the same as admitting he was a part of it. (And if he thinks that, it actually makes it seem like he was colluding, not the other way ’round.) Further his attitude is that as Putin is on his side, it’s all okay. It would take too long to go through all the lies Trump is telling regarding Russia in the last few days via his weekend Tweet-storm. For that, I highly recommend this article from the Washington Post, which says it all: ‘Fact-checking Trump’s error-filled tweetstorm about the Russia investigation‘.

A majority of the federal government (both parties) recognizes that Russia is the biggest problem. One of the few things they’ve cooperated on was to vote for sanctions on Russia. The president refuses to implement them. Then, just today, he has the effrontery to put out this tweet:

The annoying thing is how many people believe him.

One of the interesting things about the Gallup poll is how differently supporters of of the different parties cast their votes. Many Democrats did, in fact, recognize the danger of Russia. However, so few Republicans felt the same that their votes were nullified. Republicans have traditionally been the anti-Russia party, but that has changed with the Trump presidency. Now, with their leader in a Twitter battle with the leader of North Korea, they see that country as the greater threat.

US Enemies - votes by party

(Source: Gallup. Click graphic to go to source.)

There is one recent tweet by Trump that is accurate though:

This is what Putin wants. He wants Western-style democracy to look unstable, and therefore make Putin-style democracy appear more desirable to his people. And he’s succeeding. He’s hugely popular in Russia, and it’s unlikely that will change any time soon. Kim Jong un is also winning the ratings game at home. His own people love him like a god. Trump on the other hand, is not doing so well. Does he really want to rely on Russia to win him the next election?


Political Tweets

I’m getting in on the act again today …


(via Ann German.)


President Trump supports the gerrymandering of his party. Perhaps worse, should he be commenting on this while there could be more legal action? SCOTUS is already conservative, and he’s all but telling them how to vote!


Why won’t most Republicans criticize Trump?
(Via Ann German.)


A couple of responses:



Pre-Mueller Time Tweets

More gaslighting: once again Trump is attempting to change history. The problem is, there’s a solid third of the US who will believe his version. That’s dangerous for society as a whole as trust in democracy is being greatly eroded. That’s one thing Trump is right about – it’s just what Russia wants.
(Via Ann German.)


The link in the above tweet is to this one from Trump:


Gun Safety Tweets

Too often, this is what “Right to Carry” leads to …


Why do so many consider this an acceptable situation?


What a wonderful gesture!
(Via Ann German.)


This is the tweet linked to in the above tweet:

Dinesh D’Souza is a disgraceful example of a human being.
(Via Ann German.)


Religion Tweets

This is from Facebook (via Diana McPherson) but it shows the kind of revolting stuff that USians have to put up with.


Science Tweets

Very cool! These people are designing ships to reduce CO2 emissions.


Science: doing what prayer can’t.


Entertainment Tweets

You gotta wonder what the white supremacists are saying about this movie! I mean, what can they say? What exactly is there to complain about (although I do note that some idiots have found something).


Scenic Tweets

This is a wonderful video! I highly recommend taking the time to watch.


Paleontology Tweets

This is so cool!


Other Animals Tweets

Before we get onto the tweets, we’ve got a special treat today. Here are some of Linda Calhoun’s kids! Aren’t they cute?!


Excellent episode of WildWatch this month. There are all sorts of creatures, including a pair of swans who’ve been together nineteen years!


A fantastic project to reintroduce beavers to the UK.


Bird Tweets

I love these!


Dog Tweets

Awww …




Check out those puppies!


Cat Tweets

What a cutie!!!




Happily sitting in the snow! I guess that’s what you do when you’re from Siberia!


I suspect it feels how I do right now!


If you enjoyed reading this, please consider donating a dollar or two to help keep the site going. Thank you.



13 Responses to “The US Enemies List (plus Tweets)”

  1. Linda Calhoun says:

    First, thank you, Heather, for showing our new babies. The little girl with her tongue sticking out was our firstborn this year, so we’ve already started out with somebody with an attitude!! Also, please note that the little red doe was only two days old when that picture was taken, and there is no blood on her ears. We don’t cut their ears off; they’re born that way!!

    On to the subject of the day: I noticed that many Republicans are calling the students “dupes” for supporting gun control. Since it’s becoming clear how much Russian influence there has been on social media platforms, I think it pays all of us to ask ourselves how we are being duped, and how we can cross-check the information we’re relying on to form our opinions. Which sites are reliable, and which may be infected? How can we identify the true origin of statements which we’re using to buttress our opinions?

    And, as for those kids being duped, they are relying on their actual lived experience, horrible as it is. We need to stop assuming that opinions which differ from our own are formed with ulterior motives, until those motives have been actually demonstrated. It is perfectly possible for people to have legitimately formed opinions, without having been conned somehow.

    So, how do we decide? The measure that I use is to observe behavior. When politicians offer thoughts and prayers without any concrete, problem-solving attempts, that disparity between speech and action is evidence of bad faith. When the survivors of the Florida shooting organize, and hopefully when they register and vote, the congruence between their speech and their actions is evidence of good faith.

    Ask the denigrators why, when confronted with a difference of opinion, their response is not to counter an argument with their “better” argument, but to attack the people with a different opinion. Is that all they have to offer? If they can’t support their position with an argument of substance, that should tell us something about the inherent value of that position.

    We need to not let up on this. It’s the only way that the problem will ever be addressed. I have said many times that eventually enough of us will have been personally affected by gun violence that the sheer weight of numbers will rise up and make changes.

    I hope we don’t have to wait that long for it to happen.


    • Yakaru says:

      As well as learning to cross reference information, people should be learning in school at least how to hold an opinion provisionally if they haven’t checked it, rather than just buying into it emotionally. And maybe learn how to retract previous statements too. These should be basic skills for the first generation to grow up leaving a permanent trail of embarrassing statements on social media.

      And those are nice goats! (There are not enough goats on the internet.)

      • Watching these high school kids speak – they’re amazing. A real step up from the snowflake generation. Maybe this is what the example provided by eight years of Obama does for young, impressionable minds?

    • There was an interesting debate on CNN last night your time about this. Not only are opponents of gun laws saying the kids have been duped, they’re saying some are paid actors who travel in whenever there’s a crisis. One of the so-called paid actors was interviewed with his father. A former GOP congressman on the panel was saying they weren’t actors, but activists were taking advantage of them, that it was terrible their fares were being paid to go to marches etc etc. Another panelist pointed out the parallel between those kids and the teenagers in the anti-choice movement etc paid to attend CPAC this week. If you have access to CNN there is a Town Hall on this tonight, I think at 9pm EST, or maybe 10.

    • Mark R. says:

      Those kids are so cute! Thanks for the added information. Do you make cheese?

      Your political comments are spot on as well. Social media is as good as it is malevolent. Russians figured this out years ago and have been exploiting the platform ever since. And Republicans think Russia is the least dangerous out of NK, China and Iran…mind boggling. FOX propaganda has seriously damaged the citizenry of this country, and thus has damaged the country itself.

    • Jenny Haniver says:

      The things that you and “Yakaru” bring up are of critical importance — “critical” as in vital; critical as in “involving the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement,” and critical in a couple of other senses of the word as well. It’s the reason I’ve gone back to crack my old logic books and brush up on fallacies, so that when these folks engage in their verbal shenanigans, I’ll hopefully hoist them by their own petard, because I find that calling their fallacious arguments what they are, and being as specific as I can, is the best way to take them down, or at least cut them down to size so one can then have at them better. If I try to counter the substance of what they say without showing them that I know full well the the structural flaws behind their assertions, they just badger and talk over and use those kind of emotive rhetorical tactics to overwhelm and silence.

      The little goats must be jumping and boinging around now like crazy.

  2. Randall Schenck says:

    Loved your posting on this issue. Wish I had more time to spend on it. My only question is, why do I have to go half way around the world to listen to reason? Yeah, I know, because there is none here.

    • It’s there. It’s just getting drowned out by extremist opinions. All media has to be exciting, and merely informative doesn’t get ratings and pay the bills unfortunately. News shows produced in NZ (and some others do the same) are required to be accurate. They are not allowed to report fake news, or unfairly spin news items.

      And with so much money in politics, there are too many with a vested interest in retaining power to increase their wealth. Most modern democracies have limits on both money spent and donated (and on time spent campaigning). That way people and parties need a broader base of support to run. In 2012, for example, if Sheldon Adelson (?sp) hadn’t supported Rick Santorum, he likely couldn’t have kept his campaign going for as long as he did. People like Adelson have a lot of say in who gets elected. So much for one person, one vote.

  3. NewsWithViews says:

    In an interview soon after Mr Tsvangirai’s burial, Manase expressed concern over the conduct of MDC-T leadership who authorised the removal of the hearse from their homestead to nearby school grounds without the family’s knowledge. “We were preparing the programme on who was going to speak when we suddenly heard that the hearse had already been removed from our homestead to Makanda Primary School, the venue of the funeral wake,” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.