<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Trump&#8217;s Tax Cuts Probably Won&#8217;t Create the Jobs He Promises	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/</link>
	<description>My take on our world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 23:15:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: j.a.m.		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j.a.m.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 23:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13361&quot;&gt;Ken&lt;/a&gt;.

@MR: Leave aside whether all of the items on your laundry list are net benefits, and to what degree we ought to chalk them up to the influence of organized labor. It still doesn&#039;t mean they&#039;re right on every issue in every circumstance.

Moreover, there is a huge difference when it comes to unions representing government workers. By definition, these unions campaign expressly to prioritize their own PRIVATE interests against the PUBLIC interest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13361">Ken</a>.</p>
<p>@MR: Leave aside whether all of the items on your laundry list are net benefits, and to what degree we ought to chalk them up to the influence of organized labor. It still doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re right on every issue in every circumstance.</p>
<p>Moreover, there is a huge difference when it comes to unions representing government workers. By definition, these unions campaign expressly to prioritize their own PRIVATE interests against the PUBLIC interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nicky		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13416</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nicky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13373&quot;&gt;Heather Hastie&lt;/a&gt;.

Strange, this kind of religiosity. IIRC, there was some talk about camels and the &#039;eye of the needle&#039;...?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13373">Heather Hastie</a>.</p>
<p>Strange, this kind of religiosity. IIRC, there was some talk about camels and the &#8216;eye of the needle&#8217;&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark R.		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 19:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13361&quot;&gt;Ken&lt;/a&gt;.

Here are 36 reasons why you should thank unions. This is especially for people like j.a.m.

Weekends without work
All breaks at work, including your lunch breaks
Paid vacation
Family &#038; Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Sick leave
Social Security
Minimum wage
Civil Rights Act/Title VII - prohibits employer discrimination
8-hour work day
Overtime pay
Child labor laws
Occupational Safety &#038; Health Act (OSHA)
40-hour work week
Workers&#039; compensation (workers&#039; comp)
Unemployment insurance
Pensions
Workplace safety standards and regulations
Employer health care insurance
Collective bargaining rights for employees
Wrongful termination laws
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA)
Whistleblower protection laws
Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) - prohibits employers from using a lie detector test on an employee
Veteran&#039;s Employment and Training Services (VETS)
Compensation increases and evaluations (i.e. raises)
Sexual harassment laws
Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Holiday pay
Employer dental, life, and vision insurance
Privacy rights
Pregnancy and parental leave
Military leave
The right to strike
Public education for children
Equal Pay Acts of 1963 &#038; 2011 - requires employers pay men and women equally for the same amount of work
Laws ending sweatshops in the United States]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13361">Ken</a>.</p>
<p>Here are 36 reasons why you should thank unions. This is especially for people like j.a.m.</p>
<p>Weekends without work<br />
All breaks at work, including your lunch breaks<br />
Paid vacation<br />
Family &amp; Medical Leave Act (FMLA)<br />
Sick leave<br />
Social Security<br />
Minimum wage<br />
Civil Rights Act/Title VII &#8211; prohibits employer discrimination<br />
8-hour work day<br />
Overtime pay<br />
Child labor laws<br />
Occupational Safety &amp; Health Act (OSHA)<br />
40-hour work week<br />
Workers&#8217; compensation (workers&#8217; comp)<br />
Unemployment insurance<br />
Pensions<br />
Workplace safety standards and regulations<br />
Employer health care insurance<br />
Collective bargaining rights for employees<br />
Wrongful termination laws<br />
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA)<br />
Whistleblower protection laws<br />
Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) &#8211; prohibits employers from using a lie detector test on an employee<br />
Veteran&#8217;s Employment and Training Services (VETS)<br />
Compensation increases and evaluations (i.e. raises)<br />
Sexual harassment laws<br />
Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)<br />
Holiday pay<br />
Employer dental, life, and vision insurance<br />
Privacy rights<br />
Pregnancy and parental leave<br />
Military leave<br />
The right to strike<br />
Public education for children<br />
Equal Pay Acts of 1963 &amp; 2011 &#8211; requires employers pay men and women equally for the same amount of work<br />
Laws ending sweatshops in the United States</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather Hastie		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13373</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather Hastie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13367&quot;&gt;Ricardo&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, that is the problem with consumption taxes. 

With many in the US though, especially in the GOP, there is a different attitude. Personally I think it is attached to the type of religiosity there, where so many believe people are poor, sick etc because they deserve it. A flat income tax there is known as a &quot;fair tax&quot; and those that run on it tend to be the most extreme of the Protestant religious - the Dominionists - like Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee. Of course, a flat income tax is about as unfair as they get. Others who favour them are Libertarians, which imo is an extremely selfish outlook.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13367">Ricardo</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, that is the problem with consumption taxes. </p>
<p>With many in the US though, especially in the GOP, there is a different attitude. Personally I think it is attached to the type of religiosity there, where so many believe people are poor, sick etc because they deserve it. A flat income tax there is known as a &#8220;fair tax&#8221; and those that run on it tend to be the most extreme of the Protestant religious &#8211; the Dominionists &#8211; like Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee. Of course, a flat income tax is about as unfair as they get. Others who favour them are Libertarians, which imo is an extremely selfish outlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randall Schenck		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Schenck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13367&quot;&gt;Ricardo&lt;/a&gt;.

I would agree with your comments in general.  However, we also know the tax laws in this country give plenty of alternatives to the higher income groups to wipe-out those progressive income taxes.  So the rich or well to do get the benefits either way.  Home ownership for a start, and the ability to use Schedule A can turn those higher taxes into greater savings.  You only have to look at anyone with a 2 to 3 hundred thousand income to see this.  This is also why Warren Buffet, who does pay taxes as appose to Trump, said many times that his secretary paid higher tax rates than he did.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13367">Ricardo</a>.</p>
<p>I would agree with your comments in general.  However, we also know the tax laws in this country give plenty of alternatives to the higher income groups to wipe-out those progressive income taxes.  So the rich or well to do get the benefits either way.  Home ownership for a start, and the ability to use Schedule A can turn those higher taxes into greater savings.  You only have to look at anyone with a 2 to 3 hundred thousand income to see this.  This is also why Warren Buffet, who does pay taxes as appose to Trump, said many times that his secretary paid higher tax rates than he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ricardo		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 04:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A consumption tax is inherently regressive.  When you talk about income taxes, they are generally adjusted in a way people who earn more pay a higher percentage. This is called progressive taxation. That is not possible with a consumption tax.  It does not matter if you earn 300,000 a year, or 40,000 a year, the amount of tax you are going to pay for a pound of beef is exactly the same.  Since low and middle class citizens spend relatively more in consumption items than the rich, they will have a larger portion of their income eaten off by the consumption tax.  
Of course, that would not be a surprise coming from a Trump administration.
(Excuse me for the mistakes, English is not my native language).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A consumption tax is inherently regressive.  When you talk about income taxes, they are generally adjusted in a way people who earn more pay a higher percentage. This is called progressive taxation. That is not possible with a consumption tax.  It does not matter if you earn 300,000 a year, or 40,000 a year, the amount of tax you are going to pay for a pound of beef is exactly the same.  Since low and middle class citizens spend relatively more in consumption items than the rich, they will have a larger portion of their income eaten off by the consumption tax.<br />
Of course, that would not be a surprise coming from a Trump administration.<br />
(Excuse me for the mistakes, English is not my native language).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather Hastie		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13366</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather Hastie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 03:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13365&quot;&gt;j.a.m.&lt;/a&gt;.

I wish people would remember all the gains that have been made because of the union movement. The 40  hour week, the 5-day work week, annual leave (not that USians get much of that), sick leave, health and safety regulations, minimum wages, and more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13365">j.a.m.</a>.</p>
<p>I wish people would remember all the gains that have been made because of the union movement. The 40  hour week, the 5-day work week, annual leave (not that USians get much of that), sick leave, health and safety regulations, minimum wages, and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: j.a.m.		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j.a.m.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 03:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13361&quot;&gt;Ken&lt;/a&gt;.

Excellent!! There&#039;s little the federal government actually can do to reform education policy, but having strong pro-choice and pro-reform leadership nationally nevertheless is a wonderful and very welcome change. Let the unions squeal and holler -- that&#039;s the sound of progress.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13361">Ken</a>.</p>
<p>Excellent!! There&#8217;s little the federal government actually can do to reform education policy, but having strong pro-choice and pro-reform leadership nationally nevertheless is a wonderful and very welcome change. Let the unions squeal and holler &#8212; that&#8217;s the sound of progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather Hastie		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13364</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather Hastie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 02:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13362&quot;&gt;Ken&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes there are other reasons but currently I think that&#039;s by far the most important. If that was fixed it would make a huge difference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13362">Ken</a>.</p>
<p>Yes there are other reasons but currently I think that&#8217;s by far the most important. If that was fixed it would make a huge difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather Hastie		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather Hastie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2017 02:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=3462#comment-13363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13361&quot;&gt;Ken&lt;/a&gt;.

Very scary!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/trumps-tax-cuts-probably-wont-create-jobs-promises/#comment-13361">Ken</a>.</p>
<p>Very scary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
