<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: To Impeach or Not to Impeach: That is the Question	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/</link>
	<description>My take on our world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2019 18:45:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: nicky		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nicky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2019 18:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-30151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Randall (the reply does not get to the right place) . There are &lt;i&gt;many&lt;/i&gt; coal fired plants in the US.
289 coal fired plants in the US closed since 2010, 50 of which during Mr Trump&#039;s short reign.  241 remain open, 51 of which are planned to close. Only one plant opened (in Alaska) during Mr Trump&#039;s tenure. Also more than half of all coal mines closed since 2008, and there appears to be no change there since Mr Trump &lt;strike&gt; won&lt;/strike&gt; usurped the presidency either. Mr Trump is making false promises (surprise, surprise!).
Coal is down from 35% to 25% of the US energy mix since 2015, and falling. Natural gas makes up 40+ % now. Much of it obtained by fracking, which also has it&#039;s down sides.
I cannot understand why going solar is not a kind of emergency in the West (or the rest of the world for that matter).
The sun delivers 23000 terawatts of energy &lt;i&gt;annually&#062;,  while the &lt;i&gt;total&lt;/i&gt; of  the fossil reserves (oil, gas and coal) plus Uranium, is about 1700 terawatt. The &lt;i&gt;annual&lt;/i&gt; solar energy reaching our planet is nearly 14 times all those reserves combined. At present we use about 16 terawatt per year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Randall (the reply does not get to the right place) . There are <i>many</i> coal fired plants in the US.<br />
289 coal fired plants in the US closed since 2010, 50 of which during Mr Trump&#8217;s short reign.  241 remain open, 51 of which are planned to close. Only one plant opened (in Alaska) during Mr Trump&#8217;s tenure. Also more than half of all coal mines closed since 2008, and there appears to be no change there since Mr Trump <strike> won</strike> usurped the presidency either. Mr Trump is making false promises (surprise, surprise!).<br />
Coal is down from 35% to 25% of the US energy mix since 2015, and falling. Natural gas makes up 40+ % now. Much of it obtained by fracking, which also has it&#8217;s down sides.<br />
I cannot understand why going solar is not a kind of emergency in the West (or the rest of the world for that matter).<br />
The sun delivers 23000 terawatts of energy <i>annually&gt;,  while the </i><i>total</i> of  the fossil reserves (oil, gas and coal) plus Uranium, is about 1700 terawatt. The <i>annual</i> solar energy reaching our planet is nearly 14 times all those reserves combined. At present we use about 16 terawatt per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randall Schenck		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Schenck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 02:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-30091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Please do not take my comment as anything other than my own lack of patients on this story.  Several good things are happening to get this thing rolling again.  The fight to get documents from Trump&#039;s financial advisers was positive by a judge today.  More of the same should follow from the attempt to get bank documents so things are looking up more today.  Much of the stonewalling by Trump&#039;s lawyers will not work and the constitution is on the side of Congress on all of this.  In the end, you can run but you cannot hide should be what is facing this corrupt president.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do not take my comment as anything other than my own lack of patients on this story.  Several good things are happening to get this thing rolling again.  The fight to get documents from Trump&#8217;s financial advisers was positive by a judge today.  More of the same should follow from the attempt to get bank documents so things are looking up more today.  Much of the stonewalling by Trump&#8217;s lawyers will not work and the constitution is on the side of Congress on all of this.  In the end, you can run but you cannot hide should be what is facing this corrupt president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randall Schenck		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Schenck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-30090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t worry about getting back to this.  The Democrats are sitting in neutral and doing nothing.  Kind of sad really.  More inspiring story out there somewhere.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry about getting back to this.  The Democrats are sitting in neutral and doing nothing.  Kind of sad really.  More inspiring story out there somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather Hastie		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather Hastie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2019 02:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-30083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30068&quot;&gt;nicky&lt;/a&gt;.

Sorry Nicky. I&#039;ve got several on the go. The trouble is I get all worked up about an issue, and start a post on that, then get sidetracked by another issue, then I get back to the first one etc. I also can&#039;t write for very long each day, and on days where I have to do something else (like Mother&#039;s Day), I don&#039;t do anything at all, and often the following day is out too. I&#039;m trying to write about issues that will stay current for a while, because often I start writing about something, then before I get done, it becomes too old. I&#039;m getting pretty close to finishing one on abortion, but I&#039;m not making any promises. Normally I&#039;d say it would be done by tomorrow, but tomorrow is my mother&#039;s birthday, so that&#039;s going to put a spanner in the works.

I do feel bad about not posting, because I&#039;m finally back to where I was before my chair broke down. I have no more excuses on that front! I&#039;m getting back into the habit of writing again too, All I can really say is things will get better over the coming months.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30068">nicky</a>.</p>
<p>Sorry Nicky. I&#8217;ve got several on the go. The trouble is I get all worked up about an issue, and start a post on that, then get sidetracked by another issue, then I get back to the first one etc. I also can&#8217;t write for very long each day, and on days where I have to do something else (like Mother&#8217;s Day), I don&#8217;t do anything at all, and often the following day is out too. I&#8217;m trying to write about issues that will stay current for a while, because often I start writing about something, then before I get done, it becomes too old. I&#8217;m getting pretty close to finishing one on abortion, but I&#8217;m not making any promises. Normally I&#8217;d say it would be done by tomorrow, but tomorrow is my mother&#8217;s birthday, so that&#8217;s going to put a spanner in the works.</p>
<p>I do feel bad about not posting, because I&#8217;m finally back to where I was before my chair broke down. I have no more excuses on that front! I&#8217;m getting back into the habit of writing again too, All I can really say is things will get better over the coming months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nicky		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nicky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2019 13:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-30068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, you are probably right there. However, there is no hurry, the closer to November 2020 the better, I&#039;d think. People&#039;s memories tend to be short.

When will be your next post? I&#039;m always looking and then: still no new post. And occasionally: ah! a New Post! I don&#039;t want to put pressure on you (well, let us be honest, maybe I do a bit), but I&#039;m always looking forward to a new one (and please take that as a compliment to the quality of your posts).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are probably right there. However, there is no hurry, the closer to November 2020 the better, I&#8217;d think. People&#8217;s memories tend to be short.</p>
<p>When will be your next post? I&#8217;m always looking and then: still no new post. And occasionally: ah! a New Post! I don&#8217;t want to put pressure on you (well, let us be honest, maybe I do a bit), but I&#8217;m always looking forward to a new one (and please take that as a compliment to the quality of your posts).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather Hastie		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30026</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather Hastie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 01:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-30026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30022&quot;&gt;Randall Schenck&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree that getting Mueller to testify would be huge in getting the country on board. As we&#039;ve all discussed, most people won&#039;t read the Mueller report. However, just like with Watergate, they will watch TV coverage of the testimony, and Mueller talking about what&#039;s in his report would be huge. Trump knows this of course, and that&#039;s why he&#039;s doing all he can to stop it. Same with Don McGhan, whose name is mentioned literally hundreds of times in the Mueller Report. Hearing him testify about Trump trying to get him to fire Mueller would sway a lot of people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30022">Randall Schenck</a>.</p>
<p>I agree that getting Mueller to testify would be huge in getting the country on board. As we&#8217;ve all discussed, most people won&#8217;t read the Mueller report. However, just like with Watergate, they will watch TV coverage of the testimony, and Mueller talking about what&#8217;s in his report would be huge. Trump knows this of course, and that&#8217;s why he&#8217;s doing all he can to stop it. Same with Don McGhan, whose name is mentioned literally hundreds of times in the Mueller Report. Hearing him testify about Trump trying to get him to fire Mueller would sway a lot of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heather Hastie		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30025</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather Hastie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 01:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-30025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30010&quot;&gt;nicky&lt;/a&gt;.

More and more are signing onto that letter. Last I heard (2 days ago), the number was up to 800. CNN is talking about it, and they&#039;re my main TV source. (The English speaking international news channels I can get are CNN International, Fox News, Sky News, BBC World, and Al Jazeera.) Many of the shows are the same ones as CNN US, and they&#039;ve been talking about that letter a lot.

Coal prices are set internationally, and they&#039;ve been really low for some time. Despite what Trump believes, no one wants to buy coal anymore. The rest of the world accepts the reality of global warming and is trying to do something about it. That means they&#039;re moving to other forms of energy, and coal is one of the easiest to remove as there are plenty of viable substitutes. (I&#039;m sure you know all this, but there are people this reading who don&#039;t.) My usual comment is coal miners are going the way of farriers, though we do still need at least a small number of farriers, so I probably should find a different job for a comparison. Perhaps matchstick girls, which would have the additional value of being a job that slowly killed, just like coal mining.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30010">nicky</a>.</p>
<p>More and more are signing onto that letter. Last I heard (2 days ago), the number was up to 800. CNN is talking about it, and they&#8217;re my main TV source. (The English speaking international news channels I can get are CNN International, Fox News, Sky News, BBC World, and Al Jazeera.) Many of the shows are the same ones as CNN US, and they&#8217;ve been talking about that letter a lot.</p>
<p>Coal prices are set internationally, and they&#8217;ve been really low for some time. Despite what Trump believes, no one wants to buy coal anymore. The rest of the world accepts the reality of global warming and is trying to do something about it. That means they&#8217;re moving to other forms of energy, and coal is one of the easiest to remove as there are plenty of viable substitutes. (I&#8217;m sure you know all this, but there are people this reading who don&#8217;t.) My usual comment is coal miners are going the way of farriers, though we do still need at least a small number of farriers, so I probably should find a different job for a comparison. Perhaps matchstick girls, which would have the additional value of being a job that slowly killed, just like coal mining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randall Schenck		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30022</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Schenck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 22:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-30022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Crazy, I didn&#039;t know there were that many coal plants.  Sometimes I think we think behind instead of the future.  Worrying about a failed impeachment because the Senate won&#039;t change or wasting time with Barr.  He is just another Trump whore if I am allowed to say that.  Once they get Mueller and McGahn in front of the congress I suspect that is all they will need.  These two will provide just about everything needed to remove this low life living in the white house.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy, I didn&#8217;t know there were that many coal plants.  Sometimes I think we think behind instead of the future.  Worrying about a failed impeachment because the Senate won&#8217;t change or wasting time with Barr.  He is just another Trump whore if I am allowed to say that.  Once they get Mueller and McGahn in front of the congress I suspect that is all they will need.  These two will provide just about everything needed to remove this low life living in the white house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nicky		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-30010</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nicky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 18:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-30010</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is talk now about impeaching Mr Barr. Although I think he should be indicted or impeached, it would hardly touch Mr Trump, the ultimate Teflon President. 
Impeaching Mr Barr might be an effort that deviates energy and time from more important issues (as, in a sense the impeachment of Mr Trump would be)
The thing is that, sadly, Mr Barr succeeded, his four page &#039;exoneration summary&#039; has become a trope. It will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to get the cultists and Russian trolls, and hence the larger public, off that. 
It is clear that Mr Trump has committed a truckload of impeachable offenses.  300 or so prosecutors -from different parts of the aisle- say that if he had not been president he would have been indicted. The US media did not really spread that message, for unfathomable reasons.
I still somehow hope that when the enormity of Mr Trumps offenses becomes clearer,  and clearer to the voters in rural &#039;red&#039; states that is, that the Senate will drop it&#039;s support. Then, and only then, impeachment should follow. It is not impossible, Mr Nixon&#039;s support in the Senate evaporated nearly overnight.
As a distraction, I note that 50 coal plants closed during Mr Trump&#039;s term, and 51 more announced they would close.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is talk now about impeaching Mr Barr. Although I think he should be indicted or impeached, it would hardly touch Mr Trump, the ultimate Teflon President.<br />
Impeaching Mr Barr might be an effort that deviates energy and time from more important issues (as, in a sense the impeachment of Mr Trump would be)<br />
The thing is that, sadly, Mr Barr succeeded, his four page &#8216;exoneration summary&#8217; has become a trope. It will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to get the cultists and Russian trolls, and hence the larger public, off that.<br />
It is clear that Mr Trump has committed a truckload of impeachable offenses.  300 or so prosecutors -from different parts of the aisle- say that if he had not been president he would have been indicted. The US media did not really spread that message, for unfathomable reasons.<br />
I still somehow hope that when the enormity of Mr Trumps offenses becomes clearer,  and clearer to the voters in rural &#8216;red&#8217; states that is, that the Senate will drop it&#8217;s support. Then, and only then, impeachment should follow. It is not impossible, Mr Nixon&#8217;s support in the Senate evaporated nearly overnight.<br />
As a distraction, I note that 50 coal plants closed during Mr Trump&#8217;s term, and 51 more announced they would close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randall Schenck		</title>
		<link>https://www.heatherhastie.com/to-impeach-or-not-to-impeach-that-is-the-question/#comment-29931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Schenck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 11:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.heatherhastie.com/?p=7289#comment-29931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, he will probably be a no show.  They should move on to having Mueller and others testify although they will likely go after Barr as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, he will probably be a no show.  They should move on to having Mueller and others testify although they will likely go after Barr as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
