search
top

CNN/GOP Town Hall – Ted Cruz

Cruz, Ted Wiki

Ted Cruz (Source: Wikipedia)

In Greenville, South Carolina this afternoon (Wednesday night US time) CNN’s Anderson Cooper is hosting a Town Hall for three of the GOP’s remaining candidates – Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz. (A second Town Hall featuring John Kasich, Jeb Bush, and Donald Trump is to be held tomorrow.) My signal has been interrupted by rainstorms. I saw most of Carson’s session (see here), missed all of Rubio’s session, and came in again part way through Cruz’s session, but missed the end of that too.

At the point I got service back after losing it during the Carson portion, Cruz was answering a question that CNN described on screen as:

It’s reported you don’t get along with fellow lawmakers;  as President how will you get any legislation passed?

I only heard some of his very long answer, but what I did hear wasn’t convincing. To start with he was blaming everyone else for not getting along with him – it was all their fault. Secondly, he was throwing a whole lot of details of Senate procedure at the audience that would make the eyes of even the biggest fan glaze over. Thirdly he said, basically, no-one likes me because I’m keeping my promises to the people that elected me. The trouble with that is, it’s not a way to get legislation passed, and that was the question he was asked. Politicians have a job to do, and it’s to represent the interests of, and to do the best for, their constituents. He was not being a politician with things like his filibuster, he was being an activist. Politics is the art of compromise and, dare I say it, making a deal. It’s about working with others to get the best result you can, not demanding your way and preventing any progress if you can’t have it.

He then went on about all the things he was going to do on Day One of his presidency. These included:

  • rescind every “illegal Executive Order” made by Obama (he didn’t, of course, say that most or all of them are legal so it’s an empty, vote-getting threat);
  • “instruct the Department of Education … that Common Core ends today …” (so no school curriculum and welcome back Creation “Science”);
  • “instruct the Department of Justice to start an investigation into Planned Parenthood and prosecute any and all criminal violations” (again, they’re not doing anything illegal so it’s empty, vote-getting rhetoric);
  • “end persecution of religious liberty in the Executive Branch” (what does that even mean? What “religious persecution” is going on in the Executive Branch? Again, it’s the phrase that’s important – voters hear “end persecution of religious liberty” and they love it.);
  • ripping up the Iran Deal (which the US negotiated along with five other nations on behalf of the United Nations, so good luck with that one dude);
  • “begin the process of moving the Israeli Embassy to Jerusalem” (this is where Armageddon becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy).

 

Like I’ve said before, like even Stephen King says, this guy is really scary. And if anyone knows scary it’s Stephen King.

Another thing I’ve noted about Ted Cruz before is that he invokes the name of Ronald Reagan more than any other candidate. He did that again at this point, stating that it was on the day Reagan was sworn in that the Iranian hostages were released. He seems to be attempting to start a myth that the mere presence of St Ronald in the White House was what lead to the hostage release, and all the work done by the previous (Democratic) administration had nothing to do with it.

Cruz is still in full flight, letting the audience know that he’s “running on two big legislative initiatives.” The first is repealing Obamacare, and the second is “adopting a simple flat tax and abolishing the IRS*.”

We then got a history (re-written) lesson from Cruz, comparing himself favourably to Reagan. According to Cruz, everybody hated Reagan when he came into office in 1980, but he became popular by building a grass roots organisation just like Cruz is. The comparison is wrong and deeply flawed, but I think Cruz himself, for all his intellect, believes it. Unlike Cruz, Reagan was charismatic, and had served two terms as the governor of a large state, so had experiencing with actually working with others to get things done in government.

The next question was an excellent one, and amazingly at this stage in the process, a new one: “What cabinet position do you think most important to fill first and why?”

Cruz decided on a three-way tie between State, Defence, and Attorney-General.

Defence because the military needs re-building. (How are Republicans getting away with this myth that the US military needs re-building?)

State, because relationships with other countries are so important in today’s world. (I guess that’s why he’s one of the senators blocking the confirmation of at least 32 ambassadors.) He mentioned again here his Day One Priorities of “ripping to shreds” the Iranian deal and moving the embassy to Jerusalem. (This guy needs “Antichrist” tattooed in his forehead.) We got the bullcrap about the bust of Winston Churchill being sent back to the UK by Obama too – he’s apparently going to bring it back to the Oval Office. (Seriously – why doesn’t he get challenged on these lies?) He said he’s not naming anyone yet, but a Secretary of State in the Cruz Administration would be someone like John Bolton. (Those of you in the northern hemisphere might want to be ready to emigrate to New Zealand if this guy gets anywhere near the presidency.)

Attorney-General, because the “lawlessness of the Obama Administration has been one of its saddest legacies.” (This is getting more unbelievable with every second.)

At this point my provider let me down again, and I got no more. I didn’t hear very much of Cruz, but I’m not sure I could’ve stood much more. What little I heard, was revolting, seriously scary, and he clearly has no idea about economics either – his tax plan would be disastrous.

Maybe I’ll bet better luck tomorrow.

 

(IRS = Internal Revenue Service)

8 Responses to “CNN/GOP Town Hall – Ted Cruz”

  1. mole at the counter says:

    You know, being from England and finding myself rather bemused by the regressive, ill-hidden religious, anti-humanist rhetoric of these people in general, I am not too sure which of Cruz, Trump and Carson that I find more unpleasant and dangerous, for not only the decent, freethinking people in the US, or the prospect of any kind of world peace.

    Carson because he is clearly a deluded, cartoon idiot.

    Cruz because he is a nasty, anti-female religious loon.

    Or Trump because he is.. well… Donald Trump.

    *sighs*

    Al Lee
    UK.

    • I agree Al – they’re all awful. It would be an embarrassment to the country if any of those three got in – I sign of the fall of the American Empire. I only mention a preference for Trump over Cruz because they’re leading the polls at the moment, and Trump has a pretty good chance of being the nominee because of the way the selection process works. However, like Obama, I don’t think USians would actually elect him. It hasn’t got that bad yet. I hope.

      But just for a minute Cruz with the nuclear codes. He’s likely to use them because he had a revelation it would bring about the Second Coming (as is Carson for that matter).

  2. Mark R. says:

    Glad you’re back Heather!

    I can’t even bear listening to the man. Just about everything that comes out of the fools mouth is either a lie or a distortion. It saddens me how the Republicans get away with lie after lie in their interviews/townhalls/debates. No one ever stands up to their lies and it’s a disgrace. You are spot-on with the “Antichrist” moniker…fits him precisely.

    I also find it ironic that no contemporary Republican candidate would tolerate Ronald Reagan today. He’s way too liberal for the current crowd of clowns.

    • Yeah. I think they need a Republican hero, and Reagan is just long enough ago that they’ve forgotten all the bad stuff; even Republicans would be screaming “Iran Contra” from the rooftops if he ran now. And Ollie North, despite what he did, just by association with Reagan in once again a popular Fox contributor.

      I was talking to my ex-Republican brother again earlier this week (it was his birthday) and he told me that a lot of his mates he went to Yale with are also switching to the Dems, and are quite vehement in their condemnation of the Republicans, because of the “current crowd of clowns.”

  3. Mark R. says:

    fool’s…damn apostrophes.

  4. Tom Snow says:

    “Those of you in the northern hemisphere might want to be ready to emigrate to New Zealand if this guy gets anywhere near the presidency.”

    I like that idea. Everyone up here who threatens to move to Canada are lightweights!

  5. j.a.m. says:

    While they are rivals now, it wouldn’t be surprising to see President Rubio appoint Sen. Cruz to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court.

    The GOP isn’t going to nominate Trump or Carson. Any of the remaining candidates, however, would be a breath of brisk mountain air after Obama. Meanwhile, the Democrats have painted themselves into a corner with an inept and corrupt default nominee. Good luck with that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

top